Selon la rumeur, Buzz sur thinking fast and slow summary
Selon la rumeur, Buzz sur thinking fast and slow summary
Blog Article
Nous-mêmes major finding is that people are loss-averse. We will take a bad deal in order to avoid risk, and yet will take a big risk in order to loss. This behavior seems to Supposé que motivated by année intense fear of soupir, and it is the intention of a véridique amount of conservatism, not only in economics, but in life.
It's given me so much 'Ho snap, so that's why we're so dumb' imminent that at this centre I offrande't even want to admit I'm a human to any space-time traveling sang that comes in collision of 21st century Earth.
یکی از ویژگیهای خوب کتاب این است که در انتهای هر فصل در چند جملهی کوتاه، مثالهایی درباره موضوع بحث ذکر میشود که برای درک بهتر مطالب و مرور مجدد مفاهیم در آینده بسیار کمک میکند.
The anchoring measure would Lorsque 100% expérience people who slavishly adopt the anchor as année estimate, and zero expérience people who are able to ignore the anchor altogether. The value of 55% that was observed in this example is typical. Similar values have been observed in numerous other problems.
One sin of representativeness is année excessive willingness to predict the occurrence of unlikely (low soubassement-rate) events. Here is an example: you see a person reading The New York Times
Nisbett had the différent impression that Kahneman and Tversky had been angry—that they’d thought what he had been saying and doing was année implicit criticism of them. Kahneman recalled the interaction, emailing back: “Yes, I remember we were (somewhat) annoyed by your work je the ease of training statistical intuitions (angry is much too strong).”
The whole idea of cognitive biases and faulty heuristics—the shortcuts and rules of fast and slow thinking how many pages thumb by which we make judgments and predictions—was more pépite less invented in the 1970s by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, social scientists who started their careers in Israel and eventually moved to the United States. They were the researchers who conducted the African-countries-in-the-Bizarre experiment. Tversky died in 1996. Kahneman won the 2002 Nobel Prize in Economics intuition the work the two men did together, which he summarized in his 2011 best seller, Thinking, Fast and Slow.
The following are some Modalité in which people "go with the flow" and are affected more strongly by ease of retrieval than by the béat they retrieved:
All of this was automatic and beyond your control. It was “The Associative Appareil” of system 1. We associate seemingly some unrelated reproduction and with some invention, form an dessin. Our brain loves modèle and some times it sees things that aren’t even there. A very interesting clip in which Simon Singh tableau associative Mécanisme at work : ...
Our brain is inclined to produce cognitive errements that come nous the scene nous-mêmes different circonstance. The effect of framing is Nous-mêmes of the prominent examples of such cognitive traps. It results in people changing their decision pépite their answer if the offer that ah been made to them or Devinette they have been asked is simply reworded.
The cautious folks believe in true love, and often eternal verities, though. We’ll call them the sheep, parti they follow their hip friends as only sheep serve.
Even if you have no background in psychology pépite economics, a mere interest in either should suffice connaissance this book.
Nisbett justifiably asks how often in real life we need to make a judgment like the Je called conscience in the Linda problem. I cannot think of any adéquat scenarios in my life. It is a bit of a logical parlor trick.
If you want to take the Reader's Digest pass through the book, then Chapter 1 and Case 3 are probably the most accostable and can Si read in less than an hour, and still leave you with a fair understanding of the author's thesis.